How much does it cost to develop, print, ship, inventory, secure, sell, and cancel a stamp used to mail a letter? What about the stamps that are never sold? The Postal Service destroys billions of stamps each year because they are obsolete. In FY 2008, the Postal Service printed 37 billion stamps, which cost $78 million to print. In that same year, they destroyed old stamps, some of which were printed more than 10 years ago, that were valued at approximately $2.8 billion. Those stamps were printed, shipped, counted multiple times in various inventories, and finally shipped back for destruction under secure conditions. How much does this cost and does the Postal Service benefit from the expense?
Are there better alternatives to stamps? Business customers often rent postage meters and use permits for bulk mail. Now, the advent of online postage vendors has given individual customers an alternative to stamps. Customers that use online postage can customize their postage and incorporate approved language or pictures.
Loading ... Loading ... Loading ...Not everyone has access to a computer. What can we do for people who do not have access to online postage or who simply do not want to use online postage? One answer may be simplifying the Postal Service’s current stamp inventory. What if all postage stamps were “Forever Stamps”? Stamps would never become obsolete and have to be destroyed, and production costs would never eat up their contribution to overhead. After a rate increase — now generally an annual event rather than every 3 or 4 years — there would be no 1-cent or 2-cent stamp shortages or rush to produce the next generation of denominated stamps.
What about stamp collectors? Would philatelic sales suffer if the Postal Service reduced the denominations it offered? Commemorative Forever Stamps could be issued in limited quantities to satisfy collectors. Some commemorative stamps could be sold locally, while others could only be ordered and shipped direct from a central location. Forever Stamps that marked holidays or other special events such as birthdays would be very useful for people who wanted to stock up. And what could be more appropriate for wedding invitations than “Forever Love” stamps?
Do you know of a better method of postage payment, convenient and available to everybody that could be implemented?
Tell us what you think.
This topic is hosted by the OIG’s Field Financial East directorate.
Topic was revised to indicate that 37 billion stamps not $37 billion worth of stamps were printed in 2008.
124 Comments
Leave a Reply
For much more cost effective, I agree on using 1 denomination of stamps. And or maybe recycling stamp, so that you don’t need to print more. Just like what they do to money,if it’s too old, then replace it.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
It seems to me it is self explanatory why we need only one kind of stamp.(Cost effective!!period) We should not have to pay to create hobby for the few. Price could go up (if necessary)each year without printing new stamps. Not everyone has or wants a computer so if the postal service was run correctly it makes sense to keep stamps.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
I agree with Jasmine. Stamps should also be replaced when they get old. And these unused stamps able to be used for years especially if they are not damaged in any way.
Like or Dislike:
0 
0
There is absolutely no need for postage stamps. We neither have a need for any fancy commemorative nor any definitive. A simple hand stamp having a denomination would be sufficient. If a stamp is required; use a blank nondenominational stamp and print the fee as required. They did this for years in FL. All stamps can be printed upon purchase. It would be a banishment for the philatelist but then again; the USPS did a great job printing mass varieties of stamps making it very difficult for the common philatelist to maintain a cash flow to collect the same. Photoengraving stamps makes them less desirable to collect. I prefer engraved stamps. Understand that there are millions possibly billions of “common” unused stamps already in our economy. I have enough to last me a lifetime.
Like or Dislike:
1 
0
wouldn’t it be much cheaper to produce one design of a forever stamp and be done with it? why is it the government’s responsibility to provide a hobby like stamp collecting when they are losing boatloads of money every day?
Like or Dislike:
0 
0