The Postal Strike of 1970
Filed under Labor
Tags: Delivery, employee relations, postal service, postal strike, Retail, Unions
March 18 marks the 40th anniversary of one of the most momentous events in postal history — the postal strike of 1970. The night before, postal workers in New York voted 1,555 to 1,055 to go out on strike in protest of a House committee vote to limit their wage increase that year to 5.4 percent on the heels of a 41 percent increase in Congress’s own pay. The wildcat strike and picketing were effective in shutting down postal operations in New York and quickly spread to about 30 other cities. Within days about 152,000 workers in 671 locations were on strike. It was illegal for federal workers to strike, or even to advocate a strike, but union officials said they had no control over the action.
The strike shut down New York’s financial industry, kept 9,000 youths from receiving draft notices, delayed the mailing of census forms and tax refunds, and generally disrupted the country’s communications. Injunctions and heavy fines were levied on union leaders; but the membership paid no attention. President Nixon called out 24,000 military personnel to distribute the mail, but they were ineffective. While the president asserted there would be no negotiations until the workers returned to work, Secretary of Labor William Usery did engage in negotiations that brought the strike to an end after 2 weeks.
Loading ... Loading ... Loading ...By all accounts, the strike was extremely successful for the unions, and it set the course of postal affairs for decades to come. No postal worker was ever disciplined for the walkout. Negotiators agreed to a 6 percent wage increase retroactive to 1969, and an additional 8 percent contingent on enactment of the Postal Reorganization Act. The bill had been languishing in Congress, but by April 16, 1970, agreement was reached. It not only provided the 8 percent pay raise, but also allowed postal workers to reach the top of the pay scale in only 8 years — in contrast to the 21 years previously in effect. After the first contract, pay for the newest worker had surpassed what a 21-year veteran had made 3 years earlier. Although the agreement directed the large increase towards high-cost areas like New York, where the strike began, it was effective across the nation, even in low-cost areas where compensation had been ample. The practice of uniform wages continues today at the Postal Service; even though the federal pay system introduced locality pay in 1990.
The binding arbitration feature of the Act could also be traced to the strike. According to a union history, binding arbitration was included in the bill “in lieu of the right to strike,” though of course no federal employee has ever had such a right. This feature of the law has meant that the Postal Service has never been able to exert control over its labor costs. Unions also insisted that the Postal Service would not be called a government corporation, to guard against any implication that workers would lose the security of their federal jobs.
The strike also set in motion lasting changes in the postal labor movement. Union heads that had tried to control the strike, and were willing to compromise with government leadership, lost credibility. A city carrier, Vincent Sombrotto, was in the forefront of rank and file members in New York insisting on the strike. After the strike, he led a movement to open up union elections and eventually headed the National Association of Letter Carriers for 24 years. Coincidentally with the formation of the Postal Service, five distinct unions of postal clerks, mail processors, maintenance, and motor vehicle workers merged into a new American Postal Workers Union, which provided a more unified voice for labor in political and collective bargaining negotiations.
This topic is hosted by the OIG’s Risk Analysis Research Center (RARC).
19 Responses to “The Postal Strike of 1970”
Leave a Reply
Hello and Welcome!
Social Media
Search
Change Font Size
Recent Comments
- Libby on Cast Your Vote via the Postal Service?
- pazarlama on How is the Postal Service Managing Its Forklift and Tow Motor Fleet?
- Woozle on Nationwide Wage Uniformity Part 2
- gareth majors on A Look at India Post
- omo on Making “Sorry We Missed You” a Thing of the Past
Recent Topics
- Cast Your Vote via the Postal Service?
- Making “Sorry We Missed You” a Thing of the Past
- New Business Mail Acceptance and Verification Process — Friend or Foe?
- Is the Price Right?
- Workforce Flexibility – Would it Work for the Postal Service?
July 27th, 2010 at 1:00 pm
Well I hafta tell ya, Ive been involved in strike action before.. Its very stressfull.. Families depending on the breadwinner suddenly have grave fears for their future.
My advice.. take a Golden handshake.. and set your self up in some little cottage industry business.. Dont buy into Franchises.. they rip you off EVERY time.. be brave.. and start off doing something for yourself ..its easy actually.. I have started 3 business from scratch.. Carpet cleaning Roller shutters and Garage door sales.. all great.. try working on Commission.. if you have some $$ behind you.. you can take your time and get some sales happening quick.. Right now Solar power is BIG..
JUST DO IT..
May 28th, 2010 at 10:00 pm
While it is extremely unsettling that a group of people have the power to bring a huge aspect of our society to a grinding halt, I think the same can be said for several other unions which exist.
When people witness a grave injustice, the can and should stand up for what is right. The ability to strike keeps the decision makers in check and is an integral part of the freedom we enjoy in this great country of ours.
April 25th, 2010 at 6:54 am
yeah, thtat’s the problems…
March 25th, 2010 at 10:01 am
Hire a Consultant to strike for you. Then you’ll get
the benefit of continuing to collect your pay, and
maybe you can take a vacation for a while too.
Meanwhile, you won’t be accountable for your actions.
That’s what the PRC wants to do, again, about Saturday delivery.
And that’s what the Executive Offices did, and the Board of Governors, and the Postal Reform Committee, and the OMB, and the GAO have been doing for years.
Think of it!!!!!!!!!!!!! You can’t lose…
“We didn’t vote to strike”, “Our consultant did!!
We simply followed their recommendations.”
“They came highly recommended by OMB.”
Remember, your getting what you paid for.
You (US) benefits from the actuarial attributable gains.
However, (US) you must pay, and suffer from the actuarial losses….
Go for it! If think you’ve got the salt?…
I think there a many-many-many ideas out there, and
I think if postal people come together with compromise, you’ll survive with limitations.
But, it’s going to take subsidy to stand up a new
2050 post office.
Are you ready to fight? Or are you ready conquer the challenges like those before us?
March 17th, 2010 at 11:22 am
The OIG blog allows only one vote per computer, which it tracks by IP address. So if someone has already voted on this poll using the same computer, the blog will not allow another user to vote. You can still vote by using a different computer. And thank you for voting. We really appreciate your input.
March 16th, 2010 at 11:06 pm
Are you controlling the vote on the polls? It says I already had voted, maybe you didn’t like the results????
March 16th, 2010 at 9:48 pm
I worked for the Postal Service and am now retired from this outfit. Most postal employees are over paid and need to be run off, the unions protect all the deadwood. Had one clerk that spent 20 years in the same office and still had to be told what to due every 1/2 hour. Most are deadwood !!!!!!!!I belong to the union until they started giving all their funds to the DemocRATS !!!~! Heads of Unions are nothing but thieves just like the current administration !!!!!!
March 16th, 2010 at 1:05 pm
What was the purpose of this article??
Oh, wait….I know….
March 16th, 2010 at 10:21 am
why doesn’t the OIG look into the 34 percent increase in managemnt ranks????