Could Longer Lines Be Coming to Your Local Post Office…Lottery Lines?
Filed under Ideas Worth Exploring
Tags: Ideas, new business, Retail, services
According to a representative on the Postal Regulatory Commission’s staff, a Postal Service-run lottery “could offer the potential for substantial profits for the Postal Service and utilize its current retail infrastructure with its 36,000 retail outlets.” Popular lottery formats in many states include drawings and instant lottery tickets.
The claim is that running a national lottery could help the U.S. Postal Service close its multibillion-dollar budget gap. It could also build foot traffic to post offices, increasing retail sales of postal products.
A lottery might bring in a lot of revenue, but would it also bring more problems?
Loading ... Loading ...- A lottery, like any form of gambling, is susceptible to fraud, despite the high degree of scrutiny claimed by the organizers.
- Lines at many lottery depots can be long when jackpots are high—stretching around corners. Adding lottery customers to the lines at post offices could have a negative impact on regular customers who are not lottery players.
- How would the states react to the Postal Service joining the business of selling lottery tickets? Would the ability to reach out to such a large audience (through 36,000 retail units) take money from state lotteries, a number of which earmark revenues for education and social programs?
- Who would run the lottery operations? Is Postal Service management equipped for such an endeavor?
What do you think?
This topic is hosted by the OIG’s Risk Analysis Research Center (RARC).
26 Responses to “Could Longer Lines Be Coming to Your Local Post Office…Lottery Lines?”
Leave a Reply
Hello and Welcome!
Social Media
Search
Change Font Size
Recent Comments
- Libby on Cast Your Vote via the Postal Service?
- pazarlama on How is the Postal Service Managing Its Forklift and Tow Motor Fleet?
- Woozle on Nationwide Wage Uniformity Part 2
- gareth majors on A Look at India Post
- omo on Making “Sorry We Missed You” a Thing of the Past
Recent Topics
- Cast Your Vote via the Postal Service?
- Making “Sorry We Missed You” a Thing of the Past
- New Business Mail Acceptance and Verification Process — Friend or Foe?
- Is the Price Right?
- Workforce Flexibility – Would it Work for the Postal Service?
July 13th, 2010 at 7:54 am
I don’t play the lottery, but I still think this is a great idea. And for those who are gamblers who can’t control themselves, too bad. It’s your job to take care of yourself, not the government’s
July 12th, 2010 at 7:37 pm
Personally, I like the idea. I think the USPS should do whatever it can to close it’s budget gap and lotteries have been proven to raise revenue for those that run them.
July 11th, 2010 at 11:43 am
Personally I think it a bad Idea
March 17th, 2010 at 2:04 pm
Bad idea.
March 12th, 2010 at 8:12 am
I wish to add to my original post regarding the Post Office Lottery idea, in which I suggested that the lottery winnings be paid in special ultra-limited edition stamps, which would have immediate value in the philatelic market.
I believe that it would also be a great idea if the “lottery tickets” were sold not as tickets, but as semi-postal stamps. For instance, if a normal lottery ticket might cost $2, a lottery semi-postal stamp would cost $2 + the cost of a first class stamp (i.e. $ 2.44 currently), and the postal portion of the lottery semi-postal would be valid as postage.
This would give added appeal to buyers, because even if the ticket portion became worthless when most of them lost the lottery, the lottery semi-postal stamp would still have collectible value. Collectors could even use the current 120-day deadline to make first day covers with the stamp, generating a little more income for the USPS, because then the stamps used on FDCs wouldn’t even serve as postage.
I realize that this idea is rather novel (Scott Catalogs would probably have to come up with a new letter prefix for these stamps, perhaps “BZ”). It would certainly make the headlines, and increase interest in stamp collecting.
March 10th, 2010 at 10:17 am
The Postal Service has always been a not for profit organization established to deliver mail to ALL residents & business establishments in the United States. The have allowed private business to also deliver mail in the last few decades.
I see nothing wrong with a lottery. States & multi state lotteries exist so one by a non-profit government agency should also be allowed. I agree they should have a seperate line for tickets. The winnings should be in cash, not stamps.