Betting on the Postal Service?
Filed under Strategy & Public Policy
Tags: prediction markets
How can companies harness hidden knowledge located throughout the enterprise? Supporters of prediction markets claim they offer a way. Prediction markets resemble financial trading sites, but instead of buying and selling stocks, traders buy and sell predictions. A company that wants to operate a prediction market can provide their employees virtual cash to trade and give those who do well over time small prizes.
So how do prediction markets work? Let’s say a shoe company with an active prediction market is rolling out a new style of boots. Employees at the shoe company could buy a prediction that the boots will hit stores on time. If the project succeeds and meets its schedule, the prediction pays $1. If there are delays, the prediction will pay nothing. Conversely, skeptical employees could bet against the boots arriving on time. They would receive $1 only if the boots fail to arrive on time. The price of the prediction signals how likely the entire market thinks the event will happen. If everyone believes the boots are on schedule, the price of predicting the project will be on time might be high — 80 cents or so. However, if fears grow that the boots will be late — perhaps a key supplier is having production problems — the price of the on-time prediction will start falling. The falling price is a sign that all is not well on the project.
Loading ...A prominent example of a political prediction market is the Iowa Electronic Market run by the University of Iowa, which allows participant to predict the outcomes of various elections. You can check it out at www.biz.uiowa.edu/iem/.
The advantage of prediction markets is that they add up the opinions and estimates of a wide range of employees. Thus, they are more likely to pick up on potential problems that management may not be aware of. Furthermore, the betting component forces people to “put their (virtual) money where their mouth is.”
If this sounds farfetched, it is not. Corporations like GE, Best Buy, and Hewlett-Packard are already using prediction markets to increase innovation and improve forecasting and decision making. Many more are testing the feasibility of this idea in pilot projects.
The Postal Service has a large, widely dispersed workforce that knows a lot about how things are going on the ground. A prediction market might help uncover this hidden knowledge. For example, if the Postal Service wanted to find out more about whether bulk mail volume would pick up, it could run a prediction market for BMEU employees who might know about customers’ plans. Or if the Postal Service were rolling out a new piece of equipment, it could run a prediction market on how successful the equipment would be. There is one thing, however, that could limit the use of prediction markets at the Postal Service: many employees do not have access to the Internet at work.
What do you think? Could prediction markets be a potentially useful tool for the Postal Service? Would lack of Internet access limit its use? If the Postal Service did implement prediction markets, what sorts of questions should it ask?
This topic is hosted by the OIG’s Risk Analysis Research Center (RARC).
15 Responses to “Betting on the Postal Service?”
Leave a Reply
Hello and Welcome!
Social Media
Search
Change Font Size
Recent Comments
- Libby on Cast Your Vote via the Postal Service?
- pazarlama on How is the Postal Service Managing Its Forklift and Tow Motor Fleet?
- Woozle on Nationwide Wage Uniformity Part 2
- gareth majors on A Look at India Post
- omo on Making “Sorry We Missed You” a Thing of the Past
Recent Topics
- Cast Your Vote via the Postal Service?
- Making “Sorry We Missed You” a Thing of the Past
- New Business Mail Acceptance and Verification Process — Friend or Foe?
- Is the Price Right?
- Workforce Flexibility – Would it Work for the Postal Service?
July 15th, 2010 at 2:35 am
oh wonderful blog.
July 14th, 2010 at 8:42 am
Dear Anna,
I’m sorry for you’re awful experience. However, blaming the poor incompentent postal clerk is simply
not right. Every postal employee is required to pass a competency examination to qualify for each respective position in the organization. So, by virtue of this information, it is unfair to assert
that the employee’s mistake was a result of their
apptitude and skill level.
However, you might look into the shenanigans, ahem… er.. I mean work.. of The Department of State as to why it was necessary for you to abruptly decide to obtain a passport on July 13 2010. I would suggest you subscribe to the US Department of State News feed as I do.
Or you can obtain similar information from the “Federal Register” like the rest of us informed citizens. Regular folks like us have to keep an eye
on some of the administration’s cabinet folk. Just so things stay on the, you know… up & up.
By the way, I’d probably listen to the weather forecasts once in a while too. You can find them at NOAA.GOV, or simply tune into any commercial radio channel.
http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2010/06/143724.htm
Instead of complaining to the poor incompentent post
office, try directing you’re complaints to the Congressional member representing you’re home district.
Have a Nice Day
July 13th, 2010 at 11:41 am
I’d like to warn unsuspecting customers of something that happened to me at my local post office.
I took my 16 yr old daughter there for a passport. We waited in line for THREE HOURS yesterday, only to be told by a totally incompetent postal worker when it was finally our turn, that because my daughter did not have a state ID, that she couldn’t get a passport. Not knowing otherwise, I went home.
Then, I read the fine print on the passport application when we got home, and learned that because I am her mother, all I needed to do was show MY state ID, and sign an affidavit. I was enraged.
I called the post office manager, and he agreed that what she told me was incorrect. I then went back to the P.O. this morning, in TORRENTIAL RAIN, to be sure I was the first in line.
Once there, I learned that the passport rates GO UP TODAY, and the post office refused to give me her passport for yesterday’s rate, EVEN THOUGH I HAD ALL MY PAPERS IN ORDER AND I WAS NOT THE ONE IN THE WRONG.
To make matters worse, I tried filing a complaint against the incompetent postal worker, only to be told by the person at 800-ASK USPS that because she doesn’t have anything in front of her showing that I could have simply shown my ID and filled out a form attesting I have known my own daughter for 2 years, that she cannot take the complaint!
AND YOU WONDER WHY PEOPLE HATE THE FREAKING POST OFFICE?!
December 16th, 2009 at 8:52 am
DPMG Donahoe talks about how important it is to scan. I have nothing but horror stories about my own pieces of mail not being scanned. I was not able to track my items over several different occurences, whether it was delivery confirmation or certified. I had to call the places I sent them to to find out if they received it or not. What is the use of having these things if we are not going to use them? Yes it raises revenue and business, but if more people have stories like mine, we will just loose more business to our competitors. Come on people wake up and do your job!
UPS and FED EX have it all over us with delivery and scanning. These incidents have me thinking about using our competitors.
December 7th, 2009 at 8:57 pm
End the USPS. It is an obsolete entity, gives terrible service, provides no customer support (except blaming the customer) and is not competitive. It is time to mercifully put it to sleep permanently. Absolutely NO Tax money should be handed out to the US Postal Service.